Evaluating Internal Controls in Cloud Computing Environments

As organizations increasingly migrate their operations and data to the cloud, internal auditors are facing a new frontier: evaluating internal controls in cloud computing environments. Cloud computing offers numerous advantages—scalability, cost-efficiency, and flexibility—but also introduces a host of risks related to data security, regulatory compliance, and third-party service management.

For internal audit functions, assessing controls in the cloud is not a simple extension of traditional audits. It requires a nuanced understanding of shared responsibility models, service provider controls, and emerging threats. Whether an organization is using Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), or Software as a Service (SaaS), internal auditors must adapt their methodologies and tools to provide assurance in these dynamic environments.

This article explores how internal controls in the cloud differ from traditional systems, the unique challenges auditors face, and how internal audit consulting services can support organizations in navigating cloud risk and compliance.

Understanding the Cloud Landscape


Before evaluating controls, it’s important to understand how cloud services work. In cloud computing, a third-party vendor typically hosts IT resources such as servers, databases, applications, and networking tools. These resources are accessed over the internet and can be scaled on demand.

There are three main types of cloud services:

  • IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service): Organizations rent virtual servers and storage from a cloud provider but manage their own software, applications, and data.

  • PaaS (Platform as a Service): The cloud provider offers a platform for developing, testing, and deploying applications, while managing infrastructure and runtime environments.

  • SaaS (Software as a Service): The provider delivers fully functional applications accessible through the internet, with little to no infrastructure management by the customer.


Each model presents different internal control implications. For example, while SaaS providers handle most operational security, IaaS environments require the customer to manage configurations, user access, and system updates.

The Shift in Control Responsibilities


A key challenge in cloud auditing is understanding the shared responsibility model. In a traditional on-premise environment, an organization owns and controls the entire IT stack. In the cloud, responsibility is split between the service provider and the customer.

For example, in a SaaS model, the provider is typically responsible for:

  • Application availability and updates

  • Data encryption in transit and at rest

  • Infrastructure-level security


While the customer is responsible for:

  • User access management

  • Data classification

  • Compliance with relevant laws and regulations


This division complicates the internal audit process. Auditors must identify which controls are owned by the organization and which are delegated to the vendor—and ensure that all are functioning effectively.

Key Internal Controls to Evaluate in the Cloud


When evaluating internal controls in cloud computing environments, internal auditors should focus on the following areas:

1. Access Controls


Auditors must ensure that only authorized individuals have access to cloud systems and data. This includes reviewing identity and access management (IAM) policies, use of multi-factor authentication (MFA), role-based access controls (RBAC), and periodic access reviews.

2. Data Protection


Controls should be in place to ensure sensitive data is encrypted, backed up, and protected against unauthorized access. Auditors should also assess whether the organization has appropriate data classification, retention, and disposal policies.

3. Third-Party Risk Management


Since cloud providers play a critical role in service delivery, it's essential to evaluate vendor risk management practices. This includes reviewing service-level agreements (SLAs), compliance with industry standards (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001), and procedures for incident response and escalation.

4. Change Management


In cloud environments, changes can be made rapidly, often through automated pipelines. Auditors should examine controls around application development, testing, approval, and deployment to ensure changes are authorized, documented, and traceable.

5. Monitoring and Logging


Effective monitoring controls help detect and respond to unusual activity. Internal audit should review the organization’s logging practices, security event monitoring tools, and procedures for investigating anomalies.

6. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery


Cloud reliance requires strong contingency planning. Auditors should assess whether business continuity plans include cloud dependencies, and whether failover, redundancy, and backup strategies are tested regularly.

Leveraging Internal Audit Consulting Services


As cloud environments grow more complex, internal audit departments may lack the technical knowledge or tools needed to evaluate them effectively. This is where internal audit consulting services provide significant value. These services offer access to cloud security specialists, IT auditors, and risk professionals who can assist with:

  • Developing cloud audit frameworks and checklists

  • Performing detailed cloud security assessments

  • Evaluating compliance with regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, or FedRAMP

  • Training internal audit teams on cloud technologies and risk models


Internal audit consulting services also help bridge the gap between technical staff and auditors, translating highly technical information into actionable audit findings and recommendations. In many cases, they can identify control gaps and propose mitigation strategies tailored to the organization's cloud model and risk appetite.

Best Practices for Auditing Cloud Environments


To strengthen the effectiveness of cloud control evaluations, internal audit teams should adopt the following best practices:

1. Collaborate with IT and Security Teams


Working closely with cloud architects, developers, and security teams ensures auditors understand the architecture, configurations, and security mechanisms in place.

2. Use Cloud-Specific Audit Frameworks


Standards such as the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Controls Matrix and NIST SP 800-53 provide structured guidance on cloud-specific risks and controls.

3. Review Third-Party Audit Reports


Cloud providers often offer SOC 1, SOC 2, or ISO 27001 audit reports. While these can’t replace internal assessments, they offer insight into the provider’s control environment and can be used as a starting point for risk evaluation.

4. Automate Where Possible


Cloud environments are inherently dynamic. Using automated tools to assess configurations, access logs, and security alerts can greatly improve the speed and accuracy of audits.

5. Continuously Update Risk Assessments


Given the rapid pace of cloud innovation and deployment, risk assessments should be updated regularly to reflect changes in systems, vendors, or regulations.

As cloud computing becomes the backbone of modern IT infrastructure, internal audit must evolve to meet new challenges. Evaluating internal controls in the cloud is no longer optional—it’s essential for ensuring data security, compliance, and operational resilience.

By adopting a risk-based, collaborative, and technically informed approach—and by engaging internal audit consulting services where needed—organizations can enhance their cloud governance and ensure their internal controls remain robust, even in the face of rapid technological change.

Related Topics: 

Blockchain and Smart Contracts: New Territories for Internal Audit
Internal Audit's Role in Mergers and Acquisitions Due Diligence
Automating Internal Audit Workflows: Tools and Technologies
The Green Audit: Environmental Compliance and Internal Audit Functions
Internal Audit in the Public Sector: Unique Challenges and Approaches

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *